SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 1450

[2007(5) ADJ 647]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : RAKESH TIWARI, J.
MUNNA LAL AND OTHERS .......Petitioners
Versus
Smt. SARSWATI .....Respondent
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 6763 of 2003, decided on 9th May, 2007)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Hemendra Pratap Singh for the Petitioners; Kshitij Shailendra for the Respondent.

Headnote:Rent—Enhancement of—Petitioner-tenant made material alteration in the tenanted portion by adding two kotharis in tenanted accommodation and sub-lets part of said accommodation for sale and purchase of wooden laces—Building used for commercial venture and earning handsome amount—Mere payment of rent of Rs. 2.08 paise to the landlord is too less—Hence, rent to be enhanced to at least the market rent of the area—Considering the location as well as area of the accommodation rent of Rs. 2,200 per month to be paid. [Paras 6 and 7]

       

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Rakesh Tiwari, J.—Heard Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

2. The petitioners are tenants of the disputed portion of house No. 1362 situate at Shahganj Darwaja, District Mathura which consists of two rooms and open land on monthly rent of Rs. 2.08 paise.

3. The Counsel for the respondent-landlord submits that the rent of the disputed accommodation is too low in the present scenario. He also submits that the petitioner-tenants have made material alterations in the tenanted portion by adding two kotharis in the tenanted accommodation and have sub let part of the said accommodation for sale and purchase of wooden laces ‘Taal’, thus changing the nature and part of the accommodation in commercial nature. In the circumstances, he prays that the rent of the disputed accommodation may be increased reasonably according to the market rate.

4. The Counsel for the petitioner submits that the case for enhancement of rent may be considered by the Court according to the condition, location and situation etc. of the disputed accommodation keeping in view the poor economic condition of the petitioner. He further submits that in case the petitioners are evicted from the disputed accommodation they will suffer irreparable loss and injury.

5. The inadequate rent of Rs. 2.08 paise per month in respect of the aforesaid disputed accommodation in question appears to be the root cause of this prolonged litigation in respect of the accommodation in dispute. A pragmatic approach has to be taken considering the area location and rate of rent prevailing in the locality etc. With the passage of time value of house rent has increased and as such it has to be proportionately increased in addition to notional increase of 10% in rent every 5 years as provided under Act No. XIII of 1972.

6. It is wholly unjust that a tenant not only makes material changes by adding two kotharis in the tenanted accommodation but also sublets the land appurtenant to the building for commercial venture, earning handsome amount, but only pay Rs. 2.08 paise to the landlord. By this he deprives the landlord of the fruits of the property by unduly enreaching himself on it and keeping the landlord deprived of the profits of his investment in the accommodation. There are one of many evils of low rent which should be enhanced to at least the market rent of the area.

7. Taking a pragmatic approach, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, location as well as area of the accommodation and construction etc. the rent shall be paid by the tenants for 2 rooms @ Rs. 1000/- per room i.e. Rs. 2,000/- per month and open land @ Rs. 200/- per month = Rs. 2000 + 200 = Rs. 2200/- per month as condition of stay. The rent of May, 2007 shall be payable in June, 2007.

8. It is accordingly directed that the tenants shall pay a sum of Rs. 2200/- per month towards rent to the landlord till further orders till tenancy survived by 7th day of each succeeding month.

9. In case of default in payment of rent, it will be open to the landlord to take action against the tenants in accordance with law.

10. List in the month of July, 2007.

————



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top