A.N.VERMA
ROTARY INTERNATIONAL – Appellant
Versus
CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DIV. ) LUCKNOW – Respondent
Hon’ble A.N. Varma, J.—Through the instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, a direction has been sought by the petitioners from this Court commanding the opposite party No. 1 to act within the bounds of jurisdiction vested in him and not to give any effect to the notice dated 30.3.2007, as contained in Annexure 1 to the writ petition, on the application under the provisions of Order 39, Rule 2-A of C.P.C. It has further been prayed that opposite party No. 1 be directed not to proceed any further with the said application until the Appeal pending against the original order dated 28.11.2006 is decided in accordance with the directions issued by the lower appellate, Court and to keep the proceedings of the application under Order 39, Rule 2-A, C.P.C. in abeyance till the disposal of the appeal.
2. The opposite parties No. 2 and 3 instituted a Suit for injunction, being Regular Suit No. 459 of 2000 in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Lucknow. An application under Order 39, Rule 2-A was also preferred for grant of injunction restraining the defendants from interfering in the functioning of the opposite party No. 3. The trial Court vide its order
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.