SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 1041

S.U.KHAN
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT JUDGE, BAREILLY – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
S.C. for the Petitioner; S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble S.U. Khan, J.—At the time of arguments no one appeared on behalf of contesting respondents hence only the arguments of learned Standing Counsel appearing for petitioner-State were heard.

2. This writ petition is directed against judgment and order dated 24.9.1982 given by District Judge, Bareilly in Ceiling Appeal No. 14 of 1980 filed by contesting respondents in this writ petition namely Natthu Singh and others. The said appeal was directed against judgment and order passed by Prescribed authority under U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 dated 17.12.1979 declaring 69.45 hectares of irrigated land as surplus. Earlier the said appeal had been decided on 24.7.1980. Against the said judgment writ petition was filed in this Court being Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 9656 of 1980. The writ petition was allowed and matter was remanded to the appellate Court to decide the appeal again. Thereafter through the impugned order dated 24.9.1982 District Judge, Bareilly decided the appeal. After remand by this Court through order passed in the earlier writ petition, the matter was confined before the appellate Court only to four plots i.e. Plot No. 2, 3, 10 and 2






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top