SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 2088

D.P.SINGH
RAM SINGH SINGRAUR. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Navin Sinha and Surendra Prasad for the Petitioner; Sameer Sharma for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble D.P. Singh, J.—Heard Sri Navin Sinha, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Surendra Prasad for the petitioner and Sri Sameer Sharma for the respondent Corporation.

2. The petitioner was appointed as a Assistant Traffic Inspector in the erstwhile U.P. Government Roadways on 22.10.1963 and was made permanent with effect from 1.4.1972. He was sent on deputation to the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation where he was absorbed with effect from 28.7.1982. He was granted various promotions and subsequently retired from the post of Traffic Superintendent on 31.7.1997. After retirement, he was granted pension vide order dated 10.9.1998 on the recommendation of the Corporation and was also paid the revised pension vide order dated 19.12.2000. However, he was issued a show cause notice on 16.6.2006 inter-alia on the ground that he was not holding a pensionable post while in Government service and since all the post in the Corporation are non-pensionable, he was not entitled for payment of pension. After considering the reply of the petitioner, the Regional Manager cancelled the pension sanctioned to the petitioner vide his order dated 27.7.2006 on the ground that he was n
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top