SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 2131

[2007(7) ADJ 405]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : ARUN TANDON, J.
SURYA DEO RAI .........Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS ......Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition Nos. 52541, 42834, 23040 of 2006,
decided on 13th August, 2007)

Advocates:
Counsel :
J.P. Singh, S.P. Pandey and S.P. Singh for the Petitioner; S.C. for the Respondents.

Headnote:(A) Seniority—Inter-se, dispute with regard to between teachers of recognised educational Institution—Adjudication of—Has to be done at the first instance by Committee of Management of that institution under Regulation 3(1)(e) of Chapter II and seniority has to be revised every year under Regulation 3(2)—Seniority has to be determined with reference to date of appointment on substantive basis—Person aggrieved from decision of Committee of Management, has a right to file appeal before Regional Joint Director of Education within 15 days under Regulation 3(1)(f)—In the instant case, none of the contesting parties have approached Regional Joint Director, i.e., has not availed statutory remedy of appeal—But since writ petitions challenging determination of seniority are pending before this Court since 2005, High Court decided to examine controversy without insisting parties to avail alternative remedy. [U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921—Regulations framed thereunder— Chapter II, Regulations 3(1)(e), 3(1)(f) and 3(2)—Constitution of India, Article 226]. [Paras 26 to 29]

       (B) Seniority—Inter-se, dispute with regard to between teachers of recognised educational Institution—Petitioner and two other teachers—Appointment of in 1981, prior to coming into force of Act No. 5 of 1982, under Regulations 5(1) and 5(2)—Found to be in contravention of 40% quota rule—As such, illegal—Subsequent ad hoc promotion given to them—Cannot be used as basis for fixation of seniority—On the other hand, appointment of respondent No. 6 as Reserved Pool Teacher on February 19, 1986 under Sections 21-A to 21-D, being substantive in nature—He is entitled to be considered for seniority from February 19, 1986—High Court after clarifying legal position directed that records be placed before Committee of Management for determining seniority afresh after giving opportunity of hearing to parties. [U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921—Regulations framed thereunder—Chapter II, Regulations 5(1), 5(2), 3(1)(f) and 3(1)(e)—U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Boards Act, 1982, Sections 33-A(1)(i), 21-A to 21-D and 18—U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Rules, 1983, Rule 9(6)]. [Paras 16, 30 to 36, 38 and 42]

       

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Arun Tandon, J.—Heard Sri J.P. Singh, Advocate on behalf of Surya Deo Rai, Sri S.P. Singh, Advocate on behalf of Devendra Nath Chaturvedi, Sri S.P. Pandey, Advocate on behalf of Ram Ashray Singh and learned Standing Counsel on behalf of State.

2. Since the basic facts, relevant for the dispute and the legal aspects involved are identical in all these writ petitions, they are being decided by this common judgment. The facts on record of Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52541 of 2005 are being stated for the purposes of present judgment treating the same to be the leading case.

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52541 of 2005:

3. Smith Inter College Azamgarh is an institution recognised under the provisions of U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921. The provisions of the said Act, Uttar Pradesh High Schools and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salaries to Teachers and other Employees) Act, 1971, and those of U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Act, 1982 are fully applicable to the teachers and staffs of the said institution.

4. On 24th April, 1981, three post of Lecturers were created in the institution under order of the Deputy Director of Education, VII Region, Gorakhpur. In the letter of creation of posts, in column of special restrictions, it was provided that all three posts shall be filled by way of promotion from qualified L.T. Grade teachers. A note was also appended in the letter to the effect that a ban has been imposed on appointments of Principal and teachers in recognised institutions and therefore, no appointment be made against these posts till ban if lifted. Lastly it was provided that the District Inspector of Schools may himself satisfy about the 40% quota reserved for promotion and after promotion from L.T. Grade to Lecturers Grade, the vacancy caused in L.T. Grade shall not be filled.

5. On 26th May, 1981 the ban, which was imposed qua appointment on the post of Principal and teachers in recognised institutions, was lifted. The Management of the institution in exercise of power under Regulation-5 (1) and (2) of Chapter-ll of the Regulations framed under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921, passed a resolution for promotion of (i) Ram Dulare as Lecturer Hindi, (ii) Surya Deo Rai (petitioner) as Lecturer Art, and (iii) Kailashpati Pandey as Lecturer Civics. The relevant papers qua promotion of the petitioner alongwith two other Lecturers were forwarded to the District Inspector of Schools, Azamgarh. No orders were passed on the papers so forwarded.

6. On 10th July, 1981 the U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Commission Ordinance, 1981 was promulgated, which conferred a power of ad-hoc appointment/promotions upon the Committee of Management of the institutions in certain contingencies. In exercise of power under the aforesaid Ordinance, a fresh resolution was passed by the Committee of Management on 7th September, 1981, granting ad-hoc promotion as Lecturer to the petitioner and other two teachers, referred to above. With reference to the said resolution of the Committee of Management dated 7th September, 1981, the salary of the petitioner and other two teachers was also fixed in Lecturers Grade under an order dated 6th October, 1981.

7. On 19th February, 1986, respondent No. 6 namely, Ram Asrey Singh was appointed as ‘Reserved Pool Teacher’ (Lecturer in Geography) (Reference Sections 21-A to 21-D of Chapter IV-A of the U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Act, 1982). It is not in dispute that the appointments offered to Reserved Pool Teachers under the aforesaid provisions are substantive in nature and such teachers are entitled for determination of their seniority from the date of such appointment.

8. The Secretary, U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board, Allahabad vide letter dated 18th July, 1986 informed the District Inspector of Schools that Surya Deo Rai has been selected for regular promotion against the newly created post of Lecturer and, the District














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top