SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 1624

M.K.MITTAL
PRADEEP KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
K.M. Garg for the Appellant; S.L. Kesarwani, A.G.A. for the Opposite Party.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble M.K. Mittal, J.—This appeal has been filed under Section 454, Cr.P.C. against the judgment and order dated 24th July, 2006 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, (F.T.C. No. 3), Bijnor, in Sessions Trial No. 223/2000, whereby he directed to forfeit the case property in favour of the State and further directed for its auction and for deposit of the sale proceeds with the State exchequer. By this judgment he acquitted the accused.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant Pradeep Kumar filed a first information report on 10.9.1999 at 4.45 p.m. registered at crime No. 702/1999, at police station Nahtoor, District Bijnor, alleging that at 4 p.m. the same day when he, his wife Smt. Vandana, wife of his younger brother Smt. Mira his mother Smt. Veerbala and Achayara Naresh Kumur Ji were present at the house, 4 miscreants suddenly appeared. Two of them were armed with knife and two had tamanchas. They frightened the informant and others and confined them in the bathroom. They also took the ornaments that the ladies were wearing and also from the almirah. The age group or miscreants was between 20-30 years and they could be identified if seen again. The miscreants
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top