R.C.DEEPAK, BARKAT ALI ZAIDI
SUKHWASI. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
Hon’ble Barkat Ali Zaidi, J.—The following question, has been referred, for consideration :
“Whether the Magistrate is bound to pass an order on each and every application under Section 156 (3), Cr.P.C. containing allegations of commission of a cognizable offence for registration of the F.I.R. and its investigation by the police even if those allegations, prima-facie, do not appear to be genuine and do not appeal to reason, or he can exercise judicial discretion in the matter and can pass order for treating it as ‘complaint’ or to reject it in suitable cases?"
2. Before, proceeding to discuss the pros and cons of the issue, it would not be out of place to mention that this controversy would have not arisen, if provisions of Section 156 (3), Cr.P.C. had been drafted in a more explicit manner. It could have been mentioned that the Magistrate in his discretion direct registration of the first information report or it could have been mentioned that he should direct registration of a first information report in an appropriate case. Francs Bienniom couplet comes to mind;
“I am the Parliamentary Draftsman.
I composed the country’s Laws.
And of Half the litigation.
I am undoubtedly th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.