Hon’ble Janardan Sahai, J.—The facts are simple. In reference proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act the petitioners were called upon by an order of the District Judge to deposit a sum of Rs. 1,86,76,652/- an amount, which they had withdrawn as compensation-wrongly to according to the respondents who claim that the title of the land for which the compensation was awarded has been finally decided in their favour. The order of the District Judge was challenged in writ petition. This court modified the order of the District Judge and instead of cash deposit permitted the petitioners to furnish security other than cash or bank guarantee to the satisfaction of the District Judge. In compliance with the order of this court the petitioners furnished security bonds as security of property and also separate undertakings as personal security. By the impugned order dated 22.5.2007 the Additional District Judge found that the security bonds furnished were not valid being unregistered. The petitioners have filed the present writ petition against this order.

2. Sri R.N. Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri A.K. Rai who appeared for the petitioners submitted that a security bo