SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 2378

R.K.RASTOGI
RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Pramod Kumar Sharma for the Applicant; A.G.A. for the Opposite Parties.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble R.K. Rastogi, J.—This is an application under Section 482, Cr.P.C. for quashing the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 540 of 2004, State v. Ram Sewak, under Section 504, I.P.C., P.S. Pahasu District Bulandshahr pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Khurja.

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. for the State. Since in the present case the point involved is legal one, I am deciding it on merits at the admission stage.

3. The facts relevant for disposal of this application under Section 482, Cr.P.C. are that the complainant opposite party No. 2 filed an application under Section 156(3), Cr.P.C. against the accused applicant and three others containing allegations regarding commitment of offence punishable under Section 307, I.P.C. and under the orders of the Court case crime No. C-47 of 2001 was registered against the accused persons. The police, however, after investigation submitted charge-sheet against the applicant only under Section 504, I.P.C. and on that charge-sheet the learned Magistrate took cognizance and passed order for summoning the accused and since the accused did not appear, orders were pas







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top