ASHOK BHUSHAN
ABDUL KHALIQUE ANSARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
Hon’ble Ashok Bhushan, J.—Heard Sri A.P. Tiwari and Sri O. P. Chaurasia learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri K. Sahi appearing for the respondent No. 6. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1, 2 and 3. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent No. 6 to which rejoinder affidavit has also been filed by the petitioner.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Counsel appearing for the contesting respondent No. 6 submitted that it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondents No. 4 and 5 in view of the fact that they are not directly affected by the impugned order. Both the Counsels have prayed for final disposal of the writ petition.
3. By this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 14.5.2007 passed by the Joint Director of Education, Varanasi Region, Varanasi by which the letter of the District Inspector of Schools dated 1.8.2000 has been declared to be illegal and direction has been issued to the respondents to recover the excess salary paid to the petitioner and further the educational certificate of the petitioner be verified by the District Inspector of Schools.
4. Brie
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.