SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 3032

ANJANI KUMAR, SUDHIR AGARWAL
PROF. KALAWATI SHUKLA () – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Both these writ petitions involve common question of law and fact and, therefore, have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment. However, for the purpose of narration of facts, writ petition No. 28777 of 2007 has been taken as leading case.

2. The petitioners, who were holding the office of Head of Department in various disciplines in Deen Dayal Upadhyaya University Gorakhpur (hereinafter referred to as "the University") have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the order dated 20.6.2007 passed by the University, appointing some other teachers as Head of Department, replacing the petitioners, applying rotational system, pursuant to the Government Order dated 24.7.2001 and Executive Councils decision dated 23.8.2001.

3. The facts in brief, giving rise to the present dispute are, that, all the petitioners are senior most teachers/professors in various departments of the University as detailed below :

S.N Name Head of Department of

1. Prof. Smt. Kalawati Shukla Botany

2. Prof. Shiv Shankar Geography

3. Prof. Anirudh Prasad Law

4. Prof. Kaushal Kumar Zoology

5. Prof. Afga



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top