SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 2789

SAROJ BALA
VIRENDRA PAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
V. Singh for the Revisionist; A.G.A. for the Opposite Party.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.—This Criminal revision is directed against the order dated 19.6.2001 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 10, Azamgarh in Case Crime No. 155 of 2001 under Section 420, I.P.C. and Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act, Police Station Deo Gaon, District Azamgarh whereby declining to release the Tanker and solvent loaded therein.

2. Heard Sri V. Singh, learned Counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. and have perused the record.

3. The facts giving rise to this revision put briefly are these :

On 27.5.2001 the applicant and co-accused were found selling solvent adulterated petrol. The applicant was driver on Tanker No. U.P. 65-D/0375 in which 12000 litres solvent was loaded. The Tanker carrying solvent was seized.

An application for release of the Tanker was moved under Section 457, Cr.P.C. by the applicant on the grounds that challan for offences under the Essential Commodities Act and prosecution were stopped with immediate effect by Government order dated 19.12.2000. It was alleged that the solvent was loaded from the licensed firm M/s Abhijeet Techno-chemicals Limited, Kanpur for transportation to licensed firm



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top