SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 2973

SHIV CHARAN
RAM SEWAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Apul Misra for the Applicant; A.G.A. for the Opposite Parties.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Shiv Charan, J.—Heard learned Counsel for the applicant learned AGA for the State and perused the entire facts of the case.

2. The instant application has been moved under Section 482, Cr.P.C. for quashing the proceedings of complaint case No. 2972 of 2006 under Section 193 IPC pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, III Shahjahanpur.

2. From the perusal of the documents filed as Annexures with the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. shows that an application was moved by Ram Sewak applicant in the Court of CJM Shahjahanpur for transfer of Crl. Case No. 2178 of 2004 from the Court of Civil Judge/(JD) Tilhar to some other competent Court. It has also been alleged in the application that the Court of Civil Judge (JD) Tilhar is lying vacant for the last several months and one cross case S.T. No. 803 of 2004, State v. Ram Sewak and others, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 352, 504 and 506, IPC P.S. Khudaganj District Shahjahanpur is pending in the Court of 1st Addl. Sessions Judge. As it was a fact that the Court of Civil Judge (JD) Tilhar was lying vacant and CJM transferred the case to the Court of ACJM III Shahjahanpur vide order dated 3.5.2006. Thereafter Ram Das














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top