Hon’ble Ashok Bhushan, J.—Heard Sri Apruva Hajela, learned Counsel for the petitioner.

2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 10.2.2005, passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, deciding issue No. 2 in suit No. 20 of 2003-04 against the petitioner and the order dated 28.8.2006, by which revision filed against the said order was dismissed by the revisional Court as well as the order dated 11.1.2008 by which the review application has been rejected by the revisional Court.

3. The brief facts necessary for deciding this writ petition are that a suit being suit No. 20 of 2003-04 was filed by the respondent No. 4 under Section 229-B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act claiming declaration that he be treated as co-tenure holder of plot No. 635 area 1.133 hectares (old No. 728 area 2.45 acres) and his name be also recorded as Bhumidhar in revenue record. The plaintiff’s case was that plot No. 635 was purchased by plaintiff Saru son of Matadin alongwith Amar Singh son of Dhanu (petitioner) from one Dambha son of Hari Kishun through registered sale-deed dated 17.3.1969 in pursuance of which both plaintiff and defendan