SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 150

VINEET SARAN
OMWATI – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER, MEERUT DIVISION, MEERUT – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Siddhartha for the Petitioner; M.C. Chaturvedi, C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Vineet Saran, J.—The petitioner purchased a residential plot of land measuring 100 sq. yards (83.61 sq. meters) vide sale-deed dated 17.4.2003. The said transaction was for a sale consideration of Rs. 84,000/- and the requisite stamp duty of Rs. 8400/- as required under the law, was paid by the petitioner. On a complaint having been filed by some person, the Sub Registrar inspected the property on 12.2.2004 and submitted a report to the effect that a two storied house with a basement was constructed on the said plot and assessed the valuation of the construction as well as the land to be Rs. 9,02,000/- and a deficiency of stamp duty of Rs. 81,800/- was reported. On the basis of the said report, the petitioner was issued a show cause notice. In her reply she categorically stated that the construction was made subsequent to the purchase of the plot, regarding which she had adduced certain evidence. However, by an order dated 17.10.2005 passed by the Additional Collector, deficiency of stamp duty of Rs. 81,800/- was assessed and the petitioner was directed to deposit the same. Aggrieved by the said order the petitioner filed an appeal before the Commissioner, Meerut Di






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top