V.M.SAHAI, R.N.MISRA
SANTOSH KUMAR @ TATA. – Appellant
Versus
MEENA DEVI – Respondent
By the Court.—This appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff-appellant Santosh Kumar alias Tata against the order dated 12-10-2007, passed by Sri Bachchu Singh, Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ballia in O.S. No. 276 of 2004, by which ad-interim injunction 6C-2 moved by the plaintiff-appellant has been rejected but the application 60C-2, moved by the defendant-respondent Smt. Meena Devi for the same purpose has been allowed and the plaintiff-appellant has been restrained till the pendency of the suit from interfering in any way with the title and possession of defendant-respondent in the property in dispute.
2. We have heard Sri Phaujdar Rai and Sri V. Singh, learned Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant and Sri Pradeep Kumar Rai, learned Counsel for the respondent.
3. The plaintiff-appellant filed a suit for injunction on the basis of a Will dated 6-3-2003, alleged to have been executed by Shambhoo Prasad, husband of defendant-respondent regarding his two immovable properties detailed in the Will, the copy of which is Annexure-3. These properties are the houses, one situate in District Ballia of Uttar Pradesh and another in District Thane (Maharashtra). It has been alleged in t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.