SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 25

SUNIL AMBWANI
HARI SHANKER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Sunil Kumar, Rajesh Yadav and Daya Shanker for the Petitioner; S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Sunil Ambwani, J.—Heard Shri Sunil Kumar, holding brief of Shri Rajesh Yadav and Shri Daya Shanker for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

2. It is alleged that the petitioner is a contractor in Nagar Palika Parishad, Mubarakpur, District Azamgarh. Due to his clean and honest activities and loyalties, many rival groups are keeping inimical inclinations towards him and as such he has a desperate need of gun licence for the protection of his life. It is also stated that the petitioner belongs to a responsible family and does not have any adverse record throughout his career.

3. The petitioner applied for grant of licence of a N.P. Bore Rifle on 17.2.2003. The application was sent to the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Azamgarh and the Superintendent of Police, Azamgarh for their report. The Sub Divisional Magistrate submitted his report on 14.8.2006. During the pendency of the proceedings for grant of the licence, the petitioner filed a Writ Petition No. 29163 of 2007, Mohd. Abdul Haq v. State of U.P. and others. This Court disposed of the writ petition on 4.7.2007, directing the District Magistrate to decide the application strictly










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top