SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 568

R.K.RASTOGI
HAR CHARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Hemendra Pratap Singh for the Applicant; A.G.A. for the Opposite Parties.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble R.K. Rastogi, J.—This is an application under Section 482, Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 24-10-2007 and the notice dated 18-12-2007 issued against the applicant in Case No. 1 of 2008 - State v. Har Charan, under Section 110(g), Cr.P.C., Police Station Barsana, District Mathura, pending in the Court of Sub Divisional Magistrate, Chhata, District Mathura.

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant, as well as learned A.G.A. for the State at the stage of hearing on admission of this application. Since the point involved in the matter is legal one I am deciding it at this stage on merits with the consent of the parties without calling for any counter-affidavit or rejoinder affidavit. Since these proceedings have been drawn on the report of the S.O. of P.S. Barsana, District Mathura against the applicant and since Smt. Babita opposite party No. 2 is not a party in the above case, no notice is being issued to her.

3. The facts relevant for disposal of this application are that on 18-12-2007, Smt. Ritu Sharma, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Chhata, District Mathura issued a notice under Section 111, Cr.P.C. for drawing proceedings against the applicant under Section 1










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top