[2008(5) ADJ 281]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : BARKAT ALI ZAIDI, J.
RAMAN ...........Applicant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. ...........Opposite Party
(Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 2320 of 2008, decided on 15th April, 2008)
Hon’ble Barkat Ali Zaidi, J.—The aforenoted applicant is charged under Section 307, I.P.C., who is said to have fired at the injured person, who received injury in his abdomen.
2. Heard Sri Prem Chandra Advocate for the applicant and Mohd. Israil Siddiqui, Addl. Government Advocate for the State.
3. What is significant is, that despite the fact, that the accused is named in the First Information Report, no motive, whatsoever, has been assigned for the assault, either in the First Information Report or in the statement under Section 161, Cr.P.C.
4. It is true that absence of motive will not hinder conviction, if the evidence is otherwise, dependable and reliable, but at the initial stage, human mind remains inquisitive and does not feel fully satisfied, if no information, whatsoever, is given, as what occasioned the assault ? That must suffice for bail.
5. Applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
————
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.