SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 1447

AMITAVA LALA, A.P.SAHI
NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD MUZAFFAR NAGAR. – Appellant
Versus
SHAMSHIDA. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
C.K. Parekh for the Appellant; S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Amitava Lala, J.—This is an appeal of Nagar Palika Parishad, Muzaffar Nagar challenging the judgment and order dated 10th April, 2008 passed by concerned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Muzaffar Nagar. The quantum of the awarded amount is Rs. 3,33,400/- on account of death of pillion rider of the motor-cycle i.e. different vehicle. The accident was caused due to rash and negligent driving of the motor vehicle i.e. Swaraj Mazda. The deceased was aged about 30 years working as mason. The tribunal arrived at the finding of monthly income at Rs. 2,400/- after making 1/3rd deduction and applying multiplier of seventeen.

2. Learned Counsel appearing for the insurance company contended before this Court that the pillion rider is a gratuitous passenger following the judgment of Supreme Court reported in (2006) 4 SCC 404 : JT 2006 (4) SC 280, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Tilak Singh and others. He further contended that such judgment was followed in the latest Supreme Court judgment being Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 2008 (Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sudhakaran K.V. and others). However, the Division Bench of this Court presided over by one of us (Amitava Lala, J.) by i






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top