Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—Heard Sri B.N. Singh learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

2. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition has been heard and is decided finally at this stage under the Rules of the Court.

3. The only question involved in this case is as to whether rejection of candidature of petitioner only on the ground that the percentage of marks obtained by her in B.Ed. examination filled in the application form do not tally with the mark sheet of B.Ed. which the petitioner has annexed alongwith the application form and, therefore, whether cancellation of her candidature merely on the said ground is justified.

4. It is not in dispute that alongwith application form submitted by the petitioner seeking admission in Special B.T.C. course he appended marks sheet of B.Ed. examination 2002 showing total marks obtained by him in the said examination. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that according to the marks obtained by him in B.Ed., as shown in the marks sheet, he was liable to be selected and given admission for Special B.T.C. course but her candidature has been cancelled by the responde