SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 1848

A.K.ROOPANWAL
PRAHLAD GAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Shambhavi Nandan for the Revisionist; A.G.A. for the Opp. Party.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble A.K. Roopanwal, J.—This revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 25.10.2007 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 11/Special Judge (Gangster Act), Varanasi, in Criminal Appeal No. 122 of 2007, whereby the order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Ram Nagar, Varanasi, dated 27.9.2007 in Case Crime No. 535 of 2007, under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Saidpur, District Ghazipur was endored and the appeal was dismissed.

2. It appears from the record that the revisionist was facing trial in Crime No. 535 of 2007, under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act. In this case he moved an application for bail before the Juvenile Justice Board, Ram Nagar, Varanasi. That application was rejected. Against that order he preferred an appeal, which was numbered as Criminal Appeal No. 122 of 2007. This appeal was dismissed by the impugned judgment and order dated 25.10.2007 passed by the aforesaid learned Additional Sessions Judge on the ground that in case the appellant is allowed bail, there is every likelihood that he will fall in the company of known criminals o











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top