PANKAJ MITHAL
MAHENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
HAQIMUDDIN – Respondent
Honble Pankaj Mithal, J.—Heard Sri Nalin Kumar Sharma learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant.
2. The plaintiff-appellant had instituted a suit for recovery of Rs. 25,000/-. The suit was dismissed by the Court of first instance and so is the appeal by the lower appellate Court. Thus, the plaintiff-appellant has preferred this second appeal.
3. The valuation of the suit as well this second appeal is Rs. 25,000/-. Section 102, CPC as amended w.e.f. 1.7.2007 provides that no second appeal would lie in petty matters in which valuation of the original suit does not exceed Rs. 25,000/-. Section 102, CPC as it stand today is reproduced herein below :
"102. No second appeal in certain cases.—No second appeal shall lie from any decree, when the subject matter of the original suit is for recovery of money not exceeding twenty-five thousand rupees."
4. Admittedly, the subject matter of the original suit from which the appeal arises is not more than Rs. 25,000/-. The second appeal against such orders have been specifically barred by Section 102, CPC. A right to appeal is not an inherent or a vested right but only a statutory right. Therefore, where the appeal is expressly barred, it
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.