SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 104

RAN VIJAI SINGH, V.M.SAHAI
AMRAWATI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
PURVANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
B.C. Rai for the Petitioner; H.P. Dube for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court—The Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. (in brief the Nigam) replaced the old electricity meter on 14.12.2004 and installed a new Secure Meter No. UPE 62373 at the hotel of the petitioner. Another China Meter No. LT-1 089513 was installed outside the premises of the petitioner on 16.12.2007. The hotel of the petitioner was checked on 26.11.2008 and the officers of the Nigam found that the Secure Meter No. UPE 62373 was running slow by 12.61%. It was decided by the officers of the Nigam that the aforesaid meter would be tested at the laboratory of the Nigam. On the same day the Secure Meter No. UPE 62373 was sealed and the petitioner was intimated that the meter would be tested at the laboratory of the Nigam and the petitioner should be present on 4.12.2008. The Secure Meter No. UPE 62373 was taken away and a new meter was installed at the hotel of the petitioner.

2. At the laboratory of the Nigam on 4.12.2008 the seal of the Secure

Meter No. UPE 62373 was opened in the presence of the petitioner. The meter and seal, after testing were found to have been tampered. Thereafter, provisional assessment notice dated 31.12.2008 was issued to the petitioner which

has be


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top