SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 2573

TARUN AGARWALA
KEDAR NATH – Appellant
Versus
FULENA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
R.C. Singh for the Petitioners; N.C. Rajvanshi, Vivekanand Yadav and M.K. Rajvanshi for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Honble Tarun Agarwala, J.—The present writ petition has been filed for the quashing of the plaint dated 8.5.2006 in Original Suit No. 757 of 2006 and its entire proceedings . The facts leading to the filing of the present petition is, that the petitioners and the contesting respondents have common ancestors and are in physical and cultivatory possession of their shares in pursuance of some alleged family settlement. It transpires that the predecessors of the petitioners filed suit No. 1463 of 1956 which was decreed by an order dated 2.4.1956 in terms of a compromise. It is alleged by the present petitioners that the said suit was filed collusively by the defendants in the name of the predecessors of the petitioners without their knowledge. When the petitioners came to know about this fraud and the collusive decree, they filed a suit for the cancellation of the decree which was dismissed, against which an appeal was filed, and during the pendency of the appeal, an application was filed by the petitioners for the withdrawal of the suit as well as of the appeal which was allowed by the lower appellate Court. It is contended by the petitioners that the withdrawal was allowed wi

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top