S.RAFAT ALAM, SUDHIR AGARWAL
RADHEY SHYAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—Heard Sri N.P. Singh for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for respondents No. 1, 2 and 3 and Sri Pradeep Kumar, who has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No. 4.
2. The notifications dated 12.3.2008 and 19.11.2008 issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) respectively are under challenge in this petition.
3. The State Government has acquired certain land detailed in the aforesaid notifications, copies whereof have been placed on record as Annexures 1 and 2 to the writ petition, for planned industrial development in District Gautambudh Nagar through Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority, which included plots No. 101, 394 and 399 of the petitioners.
4. The notification dated 12.3.2008 published under Section 4 of the Act further states that the Governor being of the opinion that the provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 17 of the Act are applicable to the land in question as it is urgently required for the planned industrial development in District Gautambudh Nagar through Greater New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as GNOIDA) and it is as well nec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.