SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 353

[2009(2) ADJ 521 (DB)]
BEFORE : R.K.AGRAWAL, S.P.MEHROTRA, JJ.
GULAB CHANDRA RAM ....Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS .....Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.3372 of 2009, decided on 30th January, 2009)

Advocates:
Counsel :
S.K. Singh Kushwaha for the Petitioner; G.P. Tripathi, S.K. Shukla and S.C. for the Respondents.

Headnote:Fair Price Shop—Cancellation of its allotment by District Magistrate—On basis of report of Sub-Divisional Magistrate—Without issuing any show cause notice, without giving any opportunity of hearing and without following procedure specified in G.O. dated 29.7.2004—Order of cancellation—Violative of principles of natural justice and G.O. dated 29.7.2004—As such, deserves to be quashed—Matter sent back to District Magistrate for passing fresh order in accordance with law. [Paras 5, 7, 8 and 10]

       

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner, inter alia, praying for quashing the order dated 25th December, 2008 passed by the District Magistrate, Ballia and the order dated 15th January, 2009 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Rasra, district Ballia, copies whereof have been filed as Annexures 8 and 9 respectively to the writ petition.

2. It appears that a fair price shop in Gram Panchayat Chilkahar, Block Chilkahar, Tehsil Rasra, district Ballia was allotted to the petitioner on 4th November, 2008. Further, it appears that respondent No. 4 filed a writ petition, being Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 60798 of 2008, before this Court, inter alia, contending that the allotment of the fair price shop agency in favour of the petitioner was contrary to the provisions of Government Orders dated 10th September, 1999 and dated 17th August, 2002. The said writ petition was disposed of by this Court by order dated 25th November, 2008 with the request to the District Magistrate, Ballia to decide the representation made by respondent No. 4 dated 20th October, 2008 strictly in accordance with law by means of a reasoned speaking order, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of the said order dated 25th November, 2008 was filed before him. Pursuant to the said order dated 25th November, 2008, the District Magistrate, Ballia on the basis of the reports of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Rasra, district Ballia, dated 10th December, 2008 and 24th December, 2008 passed an order dated 25th December, 2008, inter alia, directing for cancellation of the allotment of the fair price shop agency in favour of the petitioner as the same was against the relevant rules. A copy of the said order dated 25th December, 2008 has been filed as Annexure 8 to the writ petition. Pursuant to the said order dated 25th December, 2008, the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Rasra passed an order dated 15th January, 2009 cancelling the allotment of fair price shop agency in favour of the petitioner. A copy of the said order dated 15th January, 2009 has been filed as Annexure 9 to the writ petition. Thereafter the petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking the reliefs as mentioned above.

3. We have heard Sri Satish Kumar Singh Kushwaha, learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Sri Sudhir Kumar Shukla, holding brief of Sri G.P. Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 4 and perused the record. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of without calling for the counter affidavit.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that before cancellation of the allotment of the fair price shop agency in favour of the petitioner no show-cause notice was issued to the petitioner nor was he given any opportunity to place his defence before the concerned authority. It is submitted that the procedure required to be followed before cancellation of the allotment of the fair price shop agency, as laid down in the Government Order dated 29th July, 2004, has not been followed in the present case, therefore, the cancellation of the allotment of the fair price shop agency in favour of the petitioner is illegal and against the principles of natural justice.

5. It is not disputed by the learned Standing Counsel as well as by Sri Sudhir Kumar Shukla, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 4 that the petitioner was not given any show cause notice before cancellation of allotment of the fair price shop agency in favour of the petitioner nor was he given any opportunity to meet the contents of the reports submitted by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Rasra, district Ballia, on the basis whereof the District Magistrate, Ballia passed the said order dated 25th December, 2008.

6. We have considered the submissions ma








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top