SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 178

SUNIL AMBWANI
BHANU PRATAP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Vijay Gautam for the Petitioner; S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Honble Sunil Ambwani, J.—Heard Shri Vijay Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing counsel appears for the respondents.

2. By these writ petitions the petitioners serving as constables in civil police and posted at Ghaziabad have prayed for setting aside their transfer orders dated 2.1.2009 made by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Meerut Zone-respondent No. 3; and the orders dated 6.1.2009 passed by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ghaziabad-respondent 4 relieving the petitioners to join at the transferred places at Bulandshahar and Baghpat (within the Meerut Range, Meerut) by 8.1.2009.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the transfer orders have not been made or approved by the Police Establishment Board constituted by the State Government in terms of the Government Order dated 12th March, 2008, in compliance of the recommendations of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Prakash Singh and others v. Union of India and others, (2006) 8 SCC 1. He submits that the transfer orders are thus violative of the directions of the Supreme Court and the orders of the State Government dated 12th March, 2008 constituting the Police Establishmen


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top