[2009(4) ADJ 127 (DB)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : ASHOK BHUSHAN AND VINEET SARAN, JJ.
RAVINDRA NATH AWASTHI .....Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS ....Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 33826 of 2008, decided on 1st April, 2009)
(B) U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants (Dying in Harness) Rules, 1974—Rule 5—Appointment—Compassionate appointment—Claimed by wife of deceased (Advocate)—Not acceptable because she being not dependant of State Government employee—Cannot get service under Rules 1974—High Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction cannot direct giving of service to person who is no heir of State Employee on his death. [Para 35]
Hon’ble Ashok Bhushan, J.—Heard Sri T.P. Singh, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Siddharth Nandan for the petitioner and Sri M.C. Chaturvedi, learned Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents No. 1 to 4.
2. Affidavits have been exchanged between the parties and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being finally decided.
3. Facts giving rise to this writ petition are; petitioner’s son S.K. Awasthi, Advocate was charged with criminal contempt by a Division Bench of this Court being Criminal Contempt No. 19 of 2007. The Division Bench vide order dated 21st November, 2007 charged S.K. Awasthi with criminal contempt and directed the contemner to be taken into custody. The Division Bench to which the criminal contempt was assigned by judgment and order dated 23rd November, 2007 punished the contemner with imprisonment for a period of one month. However, on the intervention of the members of the Bar that contemner would improve, the punishment was suspended to afford an opportunity to the contemner to improve his conduct, subject to the condition that in case he misbehaves in the Court again, mere issuance of show cause notice would suffice for the sentence being revived. Subsequently by judgment and order dated 22nd April, 2008 the order of suspension of sentence was revoked and the Registrar General was directed to take S.K. Awasthi in custody and send him in Jail for serving out the sentence awarded by this Court vide judgment and order dated 23rd November, 2007. Two more charges were framed by the order dated 22nd April, 2008 and the case was directed to be listed again on 8th May, 2008.
4. S.K. Awasthi was taken into custody and was lodged in Central Jail, Naini on 22nd April, 2008 to serve the sentence. Initially S.K. Awasthi was kept in Barrack No. 8-B of Circle No. 4 of Central Jail, Naini from 22nd April, 2008 to 2nd May, 2008. On 2nd May, 2008 an order was passed by Senior Superintendent, Central Jail, Naini to keep him in separate Cell for one week and accordingly he was sent in Circle No. 1. On 6th May, 2008 he was admitted in Jail Hospital in semi unconscious state. The Jail Doctors noted several injuries on the person of S.K. Awasthi. On 8th May, 2008 S.K. Awasthi was brought on stretcher to the High Court for being produced but the Bench being not available, he could not be produced before the Court, his attendance was noted by Joint Registrar (Criminal) and he was sent back to Jail. On 10th May, 2008 S.K. Awasthi was admitted in S.R.N. Hospital, Allahabad under the reference made by Jail Doctor with the permission of the Chief Medical Officer. In the Jail his legs were tied-up with iron chain. On 13th May, 2008 S.K. Awasthi died in the hospital.
5. On being pointed out by the Members of the Bar about the death of S.K. Awasthi, which was caused in mysterious circumstances, a Division Bench passed an order on 13th May, 2008 requesting the District Judge to hold an inquiry so as to find out as to under what circumstances the death of S.K. Awasthi had been caused. The District Judge was also directed to inquire as to whether S.K. Awasthi was manhandled or ill-treated either by the Jail authorities or by the Jail inmates, and what was the reason for shifting him to the hospital and keeping him chained during the medical treatment. The Chief Medical Officer, Allahabad was directed to constitute a team consisting of three doctors to conduct the post-mortem of S.K. Awasthi. On the same day, on an application presented by Sri Rajesh Rai, Advocate informing about the death of S.K. Awasthi while in custody, another Division Bench presided over by Hon’ble the Chief Justice directed the application to be registered as Public Interest Litigation and issued notice to the Jail Superintendent asking him to explain the circumstances under which S.K. Awasthi died while in custody. On the same day the Division Bench presided over by Hon’ble the Chief Justice passed another o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.