SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 1613

AMITAVA LALA, A.P.SAHI
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
VIRENDRA BHARTI – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Saral Srivastava for the Appellant; None for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Honble Amitava Lala, J.—This appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 16th May, 2008 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Gorakhpur Bench in Application No. OA/II/279/02DEOS (Shri Virendra Bharti and another v. Union of India), whereby the tribunal allowed the claim petition of the respondents/claimants and awarded compensation to a tune of Rs. 4,00,000/­ with interest on account of death of deceased Arun Kumar Bharti in an untoward incident on 23rd September, 2001.

2. There is no dispute with regard to nature of accident resulting in death of the deceased. From the evidences and the submissions of the contesting parties, it appears that the deceased was travelling by train having valid ticket but his body was leaning out of the coach when struck against a signal pole of the railway, as a result whereof he fell down from the train and expired. Parents of the deceased are the claimants. The real controversy is whether the accident is self-inflicted injury or untoward incident. The tribunal held that the case of the respondents/claimants is totally covered by Section 123 (c) read with Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989. Section 123 (c) of the said Act speaks a







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top