By the Court.—Heard Sri Amit Sthalekar for the petitioner and Sri B.P. Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the private respondents (hereinafter referred to as the applicant-respondents). With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition has been heard and is being decided finally at this stage under the Rules of the Court.

2. The writ petition is directed against the judgment dated 10.10.2005 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad (hereinafter referred to as "Tribunal" disposing of Original Application No. 728 of 2004 directing the respondents (i.e. the petitioners before this Court) to verify the fact whether any of the private respondents before this Court with less than 206 days of service had been regularized in the past and if so, action should be taken to have the applicants services also regularized if those good grounds are there in respect of such respondents. It further says that if not, the applicant-respondents shall be kept in job as casual labour, subject to availability of work but in such a fashion that the seniors amongst the applicant-respondents and similarly placed are given adequate days of work so as to