Hon’ble Ravindra Singh, J.—This application has been filed by the applicants Tapas Adhikari and Dr. Rajendra Singh with a prayer to quash the proceedings of criminal case No. 2149 of 2008 pending in the court of learned Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut including the order dated 9.7.2008 by which the learned magistrate concerned has rejected the final report, taken the cognizance and summoned the applicants to face the trial for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 504, I.P.C.

2. The facts, in brief, of this case are that the FIR of this case has been lodged by O.P. No. 2 in case crime No. 286 of 2007 under Sections 406, 420, 504, I.P.C. at police station Lal Kurti, District Meerut on 19.9.2007 alleging therein that M/s Sanjivini Multispeciality Hospital, a partnership firm, comprising five partners, namely, Sri Chitranjan Mohan Verma, Shri Sachin Arora, Smt. Nirmal Arora , Shri Bakhtawar Singh and Smt. Rajbala requested the applicants and the Allahabad Bank to grant a term loan of Rs. 70 lacs (seventy lacs) which was accordingly granted by the applicants on 17th April, 2004 to run the hospital, the Firm. The Firm and the partners executed necessary security documents including a loan agreement on 17.4.2004. In the month of December 2006, O.P. No. 2 had met the applicants for payment of rest of the loan amount, but after consultation the applicants asked to become the partners of the Firm and to provide full cooperation, thereafter on 19.2.2007 the new partnership deed dated 5.2.2007 was prepared and a cheque of Rs. 50,000/- was given to the applicant No. 1, thereafter the inauguration of the hospital was done on 23.2.2007 in which the applicants have also attended the function but they demanded Rs. Five lacs for providing required cooperation, in respect of that demand, Rs. One lac was paid to applicant No. 2 and Rs. 50,000/- to applicant No. 1 and rest of the amount of Rs. 3,50,000/- was to be paid. Thereafter, O.P. No. 2 started to run the hospital thereafter dishonesty came in the mind of the applicants, they called O.P. 2 and stated that the Chairman was not agreed with his proposal, he wants to dispose of the property and for not doing so, provide Rs. 4 lacs to the Chairman, the O.P. No. 2 expressed his inability as he was misbehaved by applicant No. 2 and he was pushed out from the office, thereafter, the applicants extended threats, it is alleged that the applicants misappropriated the amount of Rs. 1,50,000/- and they have cheated him.

3. After investigation, the final report has been submitted, the same has been rejected by learned Special CJM Meerut and has taken the cognizance and summoned the applicants to face the trial for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 504, I.P.C. vide order dated 9.7.2008.

4. Being aggrieved from the order dated 9.7.2008, the present application has been filed with a prayer to quash the summoning order along with criminal proceedings of criminal case No. 2149 of 2008.

5. Heard Sri Sanjiv Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and A.G.A. for the State of U.P.

6. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that there is a dispute between the officers of the Bank and customer O.P. No. 2, the allegation are purely of civil in nature for which the remedy in civil Court is available. The O.P. No. 2 has filed a civil suit which is still pending in the civil Court. The civil suit is not maintainable whereas civil Court has not yet decided the maintainability of the civil suit. The allegations are not disclosing any offence under Sections 406, 420 and 504, I.P.C. Considering the same, without doing proper investigation, the final report has been submitted but the learned magistrate concerned has rejected the final report without any reason. The learned Magistrate concerned has committed manifest error in taking the cognizance and summoning the accused applicants to face the trial. The impugned order dated 9.7.2008 is illegal and is liable to