Hon’ble S.U. Khan, J.—Learned Standing Counsel has supplied copies of some orders.

2. The Court is not pleased with the conduct of the matter in question by the respondents. Inspite of repeated warning by this Court that the name of no person shall be deleted from the revenue record particularly if it is continuing for a very long period without hearing him (vide Chaturgun v. State, 2005(I) R.D. 244) still revenue authorities in U.P. are very much fond of scoring off the entries by using the magic word ‘Farzi. Detailed inquiries are said to have been held, in the instant case, however, it was considered to be frivolous to hear the concerned persons. If an authority goes out of the way to deny opportunity of hearing to the person concerned then a doubt may come in the mind of the Court that authority was of the opinion that its case is extremely weak and it will not be able to pass the order which it intends to pass in case the party concerned is heard.

3. On the other hand if the entries in the revenue record are fictitious or forged then not only entry is liable to be corrected and person whose name is recorded is liable to be evicted forthwith vide Hari Ram v. Collector, 2004 (II) RD 360, but he may also be saddled with the liability of paying good damages for the period for which he remained in possession (minimum Rs.10,000 per hectare per year). Criminal proceedings may also be launched against him. However, the sine-qua-non for all these things is opportunity of hearing.

4. Some times opportunity of hearing may be provided only through publication in such newspaper which has got wide circulation like Dainik Jagran and Amar Ujala.

5. Accordingly, order dated 28.2.2009 passed by ADM (Administration) Meerut is quashed only and only on the ground and that it has been passed without hearing the concerned persons who are reported to be 36 in numbers including the 9 petitioners. Copy of the said order is Annexure IV to the writ petition bearing letter No. 90/seven-133-D.L.R.C.-2009 relating to 300 bighas of land situate in village Gadina Majra Kandala Tehsil Mawana. Consequently, all the revisions pending before Commissioner/Additional Commissioner against the said order also stand automatically dismissed as infructuous.

6. ADM (Administration) Meerut is directed to immediately publish in Daily Hindi Newspaper Dainik Jagaran or Amar Ujala that the entry of these 36 persons (all the names must be given in the publication) appear to be either forged or fictitious or fraudulent. 25.6.2009 shall be fixed as the date for hearing all the persons concerned. Publication must appear at least two weeks before the above date. Opportunity of hearing must collectively be provided. Not more than one adjournment if asked for by the objectors shall be granted. Detailed order giving reasons and meeting the objections of the objectors shall be passed. The order shall be passed latest by 31.8.2009.

7. Until the decision of the matter none of those petitioners or other concerned persons shall be dispossessed who deposit Rs.10,000/- before ADM (Administration) Meerut by 25.6.2009 which shall be returned to the depositors in case matter is decided in their favour otherwise the said amount shall be credited to the Government account. In case entries are found to be farzi (fictitious) or forged, the occupants shall at once be evicted and damages at the rate of Rs.10,000/- per hectare per year shall be recovered from them like arrears of land revenue (after adjusting Rs.10,000/- in case of those persons who deposit the said amount as directed above). F.I.R. shall also be lodged against all the concerned persons including concerned officers and officials simultaneously. With the above observation writ petition is disposed of. Compliance report shall be filed by 23.9.2009 and the matter must be listed for perusal of the same on 30.9.2009.

8. Executive officers must realise that some times by overdoing and showing undue haste they may spoil even ex