SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 2291

[2009(6) ADJ 141]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : SUNIL AMBWANI, J.
RADHEY SHYAM YADAV ....Petitioner
Versus
SACHIV, MANAV SANSADHAN VIKAS MANTRALAY,
NEW DELHI AND OTHERS ....Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 21175 of 2007, decided on 18th May, 2009)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Radhey Shyam Yadav (In Person) for the Petitioner; P.S. Baghel, A.K. Goyal, Suneet Kumar, Ram Gopal Tripathi, Mansoor Ahmad, Addl. Solicitor General of India for the Respondents.

Headnote:Admission—D. Phil. Course in Allahabad University—Rules for selecting candidates for D. Phil. programme, are not exhaustive—And, have left sufficient discretion with D.P.C. to recommend students for admission—But, discretion should be exercised reasonably, and to find out merit of students on basis of their research and academic aptitude—Ordinarily, Court would not interfere in discretion exercised by Doctoral Programme Committee in selecting students for admission to D. Phil. Course on basis of their merit worked out—And, on their aptitude for research and academics—However, in instant case, Court found that Doctoral Programme Committee has accepted N.E.T. and J.R.F. qualifications, to be sufficient, with no further scrutiny of aptitude of students for research and academics—Primary purpose for selection by Doctoral Programme Committee, constituted by Departmental Committee is to find out aptitude, and not to calculate marks and eliminate those, who may have better aptitude for research and academics than those, who have secured higher marks in qualifying examination—Petitioner has been discriminated—And, procedure adopted by D.P.C. was violative of Rules—Papers submitted by petitioner were not forwarded to D.P.C. for taking a final decision in the matter—Held, impugned order set aside—University was directed to consider petitioner’s case for his admission to D. Phil. Course of year, 2007. [Paras 16, 22, 23, 25, 28, 32 and 33]

       

JUDGMENT

Honble Sunil Ambwani, J.—Heard Shri Radhey Shyam Yadav-the petitioner, in person. Shri A.K. Goyal appears for the University of Allahabad. Shri Suneet Kumar appears for respondent No. 5. Notices were issued to all the private respondents on 23rd July, 2007. The postal envelopes did not return back after service on respondent Nos. 6 to 11. Under the rules of the Court, they will be deemed to be served.

2. Shri P.S. Baghel, Advocate has also entered appearance for the University and has filed affidavit of Shri Rajendra Govind Harshe, the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Allahabad.

3. At the admission stage the Court required the University to file affidavit and to produce records. On 31.8.2007 the Court passed following orders :

“It is admitted to the University that admission to Research Course is regulated by Statutory Ordinances in the name of ‘Ordinances for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy’ and the procedure for consideration of the application has been provided by the ‘Rule for D. Phil Research’ as approved by Executive Committee (Annexure-SCA-3 to the affidavit of Head of the Department). Ordinance Nos. 2, 3 as well as Rules 2, 3 and 4 relevant for our purposes are being quoted below :

“Ord.2. The candidate shall apply for admission in the University stating his qualifications and the subject he proposes to investigate and enclosing a statement of any work he may have done in the subject.

Ord.3. The application shall be placed before the Research Degree Committee consisting of the Vice-Chancellor, the Dean of Faculty and the Head or Heads of Departments concerned; they shall have the power to co-opt two other members. This Committee shall satisfy itself that the subject offered is one which can profitably be pursued under the superintendence of the University and that the candidate possesses the requisite qualifications and equipment. If the Committee is satisfied on these points, it shall grant the application for admission and appoint a member of the teaching staff or in a special case a distinguished scholar or a retired teacher of the University residing within the territorial limit of the University and working in the laboratories of Allahabad recognised by the aforesaid Committee, to guide the work of the candidate. The proceedings of the Committee shall be reported to the Faculty Board at its next meeting.

Rule 2. Each Department will form a Doctoral Programme Committee (DPC) constituted by the Departmental Committee, or where the Departmental Committee cannot be constituted, by the Head of the Department, consisting upto 5 senior faculty members representing the broad areas of research and specialization.

The DPC will perform the following functions :

(e) recommend students on merit on the basis of their research and academic aptitude who can be admitted to the D. Phil. programme. A candidate must have obtained a post graduate degree in the subject or a cognate subject from a recognized University.

(f) monitor the progress of all research scholars.

(g) recommend/approve the names of supervisors for each candidate based on the area of interest, availability of seats, supervisor’s consent, etc. and recommend names of students whose progress is unsatisfactory to the R.D.C. For striking off their names from the rolls.

(h) prescribe such course work or training necessary for each student.

(i) organize special lectures, classes, seminars, and workshops so as to provide training in various research areas and methodology of research.

(j) take appropriate steps for enhancing the quality of research programme and specifically ensure authenticity of information.

Rule 3. All students who are recommended for admission must have consistently good academic record as defined by the UGC and aptitude for research and teaching. Students who can peruse research on a full time basis only shall be enrolled. Students perusing any other courses of study in this or any other University will not be admitted or wi


















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top