IMTIYAZ MURTAZA, K.N.PANDEY
IRFAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
Honble Imtiyaz Murtaza, J.—The application in hand has been preferred on behalf of Ahsan under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The applicant-appellant is one of the appellants in the above mentioned pending appeal. The prayer made in the application is that the judgment and order of conviction and sentences recorded against the appellant be suspended pending appeal.
2. The appeal impugning the judgment and order of conviction was preferred in this Court on 3.7.1989 and the same was admitted by means of order dated 4.7.1989 attended with further order to enlarge the appellant on bail pending appeal. The reason for preferring this application as assigned in the application is that the appellant intends to contest the Lok Sabha election and 18.4.2009 being the last date for filing nomination, the learned counsel insisted on disposal of the application. Regard being• had to urgency of the matter as pointed out by the learned counsel, the matter was heard at length and having considered the matter in all its ramifications, the application was rejected studded with the observation that detailed orders shall follow. The detailed order runs as under :
3. It wou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.