SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 2632

SHRI KANT TRIPATHI
RAM CHANDA BALANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Shri Kant Tripathi, J.—The applicants Ram Chanda Balani and his son Shyam Balani have filed this application under Section 482, Cr.P.C. for quashing the proceedings of the Criminal Case No. 399 of 2000, State v. Ram Chanda Balani and another, under Section 380, IPC pending in the Court of Ist Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura along with the impugned order dated 6.11.2004 and charge-sheets dated 25.4.2000 and 5.7.2000.

2. Neither the opposite party No. 1 nor the opposite party No. 2 (the complainant) filed any counter affidavit.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the applicants, the learned AGA for the State and also the learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 and perused the record.

4. It is alleged that the marriage of the applicant No. 2 Shyam Balani, son of the applicant No. 1, was to take place on 5.5.1997. The applicants had gone to the house of the opposite party No. 2 Gurudeo Sharma on 1.4.1997 at about 10.00 AM to invite him for the marriage. At that time the opposite party No. 2 was not present in his house but his servant Mohan Singh Yadav (informant) was present, who entertained the applicants in the house of the opposite party No. 2





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top