SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 2643

RAKESH SHARMA
HARDESHWAR NATH – Appellant
Versus
NANDLAL – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Anil Kumar Mishra for the Appellant; Surendra Tiwari for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Rakesh Sharma, J.—Heard Sri Anil Kumar Misra, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Surendra Tiwari, learned counsel for the Caveator-Respondents.

2. This First Appeal From Order has come up for admission today.

3. This First Appeal From Order is directed against the judgment and order dated 14.5.2009 and the decree dated 25.5.2009, passed by the IInd Additional District Judge, Sonbhadra, in Civil Appeal No. 15 of 2008, setting aside the judgment and order dated 29th April, 2008, passed by the learned Trial Court in Case No. 142 of 1997, Hradeshwar Nath v. Nandlal and another.

4. It emerges from the record that a Suit was filed in the year 1997 by one Hradeshwar Nath, the appellant herein, against the respondents, Nandlal and Amarnath, seeking permanent injunction, restraining the respondents from interfering in peaceful possession over the agricultural property in dispute and the Bamboo Grove. A restraint order was sought, restraining the respondent from felling and cutting the Bamboo Trees. The Trial Court, that is, the IInd Additional Civil Judge (J.D.), Sonbhadra, by passing a detailed judgment dated 29th April, 2008, had set at rest the controversy raised i

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top