SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 2619

SHRI KANT TRIPATHI
SHAMBHOO NATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
K.K. Singh for the Appellant; A.G.A. for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Shri Kant Tripathi, J.—Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned AGA and perused the record.

2. The appellant Shambhoo Nath has preferred this appeal against the order dated 10.11.2008 passed in Misc. Case No. 40 of 2006, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Tract Court No. 2, Bhadohi, whereby the learned lower Court has rejected the appellant’s application for recall of the orders dated 22.9.2006 and 7.10.2006.

3. As per the office report, the appeal is time barred. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant has filed a petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C. well within the time but the petition was found incompetent and Hon’ble Ravindra Singh, J. passed the order dated 3.2.2009 directing the appellant to convert the petition as a criminal appeal. Accordingly the appellant filed the instant criminal appeal. The record of the Criminal Misc. Case No. 2337 of 2009 filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C. have also been annexed with this appeal. In my opinion, the appellant has properly explained the delay and has given sufficient causes for condonation of the delay. Accordingly the delay is condoned.

4. Heard the learned counse










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top