Hon’ble D.P. Singh, J.—Heard counsel for the parties.

2. This petition by the landlord is directed against a judgment and order dated 22.10.2005 whereby the Additional District Judge, Bijnor has allowed the revision of the respondent-tenant setting aside the order of eviction passed by the trial Court.

3. Originally late Ram Niwas, father of petitioner Nos. 1 to 4 was a tenant of the disputed premises situated in Tehsil Dhampur in district Bijnore at a monthly rent of Rs.12.50, on his demise, they became tenants of the disputed premises. The petitioner-landlord vide notice dated 4.3.2002 terminated the tenancy of the tenants on the ground of default, sub-letting to respondent No. 5, material alteration etc. which was registered as SCC Case No. 60 of 2002. The respondents filed their written statement denying the plaint allegations and the trial Court framed at least five issues including on the point of sub-letting and whether the tenants were entitled for protection under Section 20(4) of U.P. Act No. XIII of 1972 (here-in-after referred to as the Act). After the parties had led their evidence, it decreed the suit holding that the respondent No. 5 was not a member of the f