AMITAVA LALA, SHISHIR KUMAR
OM SARAN TRIPATHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Honble Amitava Lala, J.—The petitioner has made this writ petition to direct the respondents to pay the salary and emoluments of the post of Principal to the petitioner when he has acted as Principal in the institution from the month of July, 2008 till date. He relied upon the judgments of this Bench dated 18th September, 2008 passed in C.M.W.P. No. 49172 of 2008 (Dr. V.K.Tiwari v. Director of Education and others).
2. Learned Standing Counsel has taken a different view in view of the judgment reported in 2007 (4) ESC 2261 (All)(DB), Daljeet Singh v. State of U.P. and others, to substantiate that there is distinction between a government servant who is promoted to higher post and who is discharging duties of the higher post on the exigencies. Mere discharge of such duties in the higher post cannot be treated as promotion, therefore, the person acted as adhoc Principal in the institution cannot get salary and emoluments of the regular Principal.
3. Mr. Arvind Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, has relied upon another Division Bench judgment reported in 1997 (1) ESC 164 (All), Km. Renu Tiwari and others v. Director, Higher Education, Allahabad (U.P.) an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.