S.U.KHAN
RIZ PAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble S.U. Khan, J.—Learned Standing Counsel has agreed for final disposal of the writ petition without filing counter affidavit.
2. In this writ petition on 25.8.2009 following order was passed :
“Through five lines order contained in Annexure-1 Consolidation Officer, Anoop Sahar District Bulandshahar has cancelled the names of the petitioners which were continuing since 1992 in the Khatauni, copy of which is Annexure-2 to the writ petition. The land in dispute is mentioned as Shreni-3 and in possession of asamies. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that several such orders have been passed by C.O., Anoopsahar District Bulandsahar.
Shri N.P. Pandey, learned Standing Counsel shall at once seek instructions in this regard. The Court completely fails to understand that why Revenue authorities and Consolidation authorities pass orders cancelling long standing entries without hearing the parties concerned. This is virtually massacre of Justice. When large number of people are involved notice may be served through publication as held by me in 2009 (107) R.D. 405, Kunti v. Commissioner. Such types of orders are actually against the State for the reason that when such or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.