SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 2636

VINOD PRASAD
Rajwati – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Sanjeev Kumar Pandey for the Revisionist; A.G.A. for the Opposite Party.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Vinod Prasad, J.—Heard Sri Sanjeev Kumar Pandey learned Counsel for the revisionist and learned AGA.

2. Since only a question of law is involved in this case, therefore, in agreement of with both the parties, this revision is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself and is decided finally by this order.

3. The question of law involved in this case is as to what is the scope and power of the Magistrate under Section 156 (3), Cr.P.C. But before adverting to the said contention, which constitute legal submission raised by both sides, a narration of the facts seems to be indispensable must.

4. Rajwati wife of Ajay Pal Singh is the resident of village Angadpur, P.S. Sakit, district Etah. On 20.2.2006 her son Shankar Bhan Singh was attempted to be annihilated by firing murderous shots at him by Radhey Shyam and others in which Shankar Bhan Singh sustained serious injuries. A report of the said incident was lodged at P.S. Sakit. To save their skin from the aforesaid crime, which resulted in the registration of the case against the malefactors, Radhey Shyam accused in the aforesaid case managed a false medical and x-ray report of one Mukesh Kumar prepared
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top