SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 3158

POONAM SRIVASTAVA
BASANT LAL BANARSI LAL PVT. LTD. , DISTT. KANPUR – Appellant
Versus
SANTOSH KUMAR GUPTA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Navin Sinha, Atul Dayal for the Petitioner; Saurabh Srivastava, M.K. Gupta for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Mrs. Poonam Srivastav, J.—The order of vacancy in respect of premises No. 73/16, Collector Ganj, Kanpur Nagar dated 14.12.2006, Annexure-6 to the writ petition, passed by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer/City Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar in case No. 80 of 2004 and judgment dated 10.10.2007 passed by the Additional District Judge, Court No. 5, Kanpur Nagar in Rent Revision No. 6 of 2007, M/s. Basant Lal Banarasi Lal Pvt. Ltd. v. Santosh Kumar Gupta and another, are impugned in the instant writ petition.

2. According to the petitioner, he started business in the name and style firm M/s. Basant Lal Banarsi Lal in the year 1943. Initially the firm started with Basant Lal and his son. It was a registered partnership firm, registered in Bombay, Maharashtra and its branch was running in the premises in question. Learned counsel for the petitioner has detailed the pedigree in paragraph 4 of the writ petition as below :

Basant Lal

I I

Banarasi Lal Satya Narain

I I I

Nagarmal JI Makhan Lal Ji Narottam Ji

I I

Janardan Ji Bhagwati Pd. Ji

I

Pradeep Kumar Ji

3. Further submission of Sen







































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top