Hon’ble Sabhajeet Yadav, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The order which I propose to pass in the writ petition I need not hear the respondents.

2. By this petition the petitioner has challenged the award of Labour Court dated 31st July, 1993 published in Gazette on 30.11.1993 (Annexure-1 of the writ petition), whereby Labour Court has adjudicated the industrial dispute referred to it and made award in favour of workman.

3. The brief facts leading to the case are that the respondent No. 3 was appointed as bus conductor in U.P. Government Roadways Establishment, Farrukhabad and after creation of U.P. Roadways Corporation the services of respondent No. 3 were placed on deputation with the services of the Corporation. In the year 1975 a departmental inquiry was held against the respondent No. 3 and his services were dispensed with on 21st June, 1976. Against the said order the respondent No. 3 filed appeal before next higher authority, wherein the appellate authority had given one more opportunity to the respondent No. 3 to serve the department Corporation vide order dated 28th July, 1976 on the post of bus conductor by re-appointing him afresh w.e.f. 6.8.1976 from