SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 3264

A.P.SAHI
HEERA LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Lalji Pandey for the Petitioner; Nil for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble A.P. Sahi, J.—The petitioner is a class IV employee in an Intermediate College governed by the provisions of Intermediate Education Act 1921 and the Regulations framed thereunder.

2. The petitioner has questioned the compassionate appointment of respondent No. 6 on the ground that the post in question namely the post of assistant clerk has to be filled up by promotion in view of the provisions contained in Chapter III Rule 2 of the Regulations framed under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act 1921.

3. It is undisputed that there are three posts of clerks including the post of head clerk in the institution. The petitioner contends that no post of clerk has been filled up by promotion and the post which has fallen vacant on account of the retirement of head clerk on 31.1.2007, the assistant clerk has already been promoted, as a result whereof the other post of assistant clerk under 50% quota is also liable to be filled up by way of promotion. The petitioner further contends that he belongs to the Scheduled Caste category and as such is also entitled to be promoted extending the benefit of reservation for Scheduled Castes.

4. There can be no dispute that the post of promot




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top