POONAM SRIVASTAVA
RAJ NARAIN PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
Hon’ble Mrs. Poonam Srivastav, J.—Record of criminal appeal has been received back after a direction from the Apex Court dated 7.2.2005. Record of trial Court in the instant appeal could not be traced out despite several order and best efforts of the Court. On perusal of various letters sent to District Judge, Ballia, it transpires that record of instant criminal appeal No. 2120 of 1981, Raj Narain Pandey v. State, arising from Session Trial No. 152 of 1980, under Section 307 I.P.C. P.S. Bansdih Road, District Ballia, decided by Sri Hem Raj Ram, Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Ballia, vide judgment and order dated 17.9.1981, could not be reconstructed.
2. Intimation was sent to Section Officer, criminal department by means of letter dated 20.12.2002 after obtaining due endorsement from Additional Sessions Judge, Ballia. There are various letters which clearly establish that record of Session Trial was weeded out, therefore, appeal was finally allowed by this Court vide judgment and order dated 16.1.2004.
3. The judgment was challenged by the State before the Apex Court whereby appeal filed by the State, was allowed. The judgment and order dated 16.1.2004 passed by this Court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.