Hon’ble Virendra Kumar Dixit, J.—Heard Shri Firoz Ahmad Khan learned counsel for the revisionist and Shri Rajendra Kumar Dwivedi, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. Perused the lower Court record and other relevant documents on record.

2. This criminal revision under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 has been preferred against the judgement and order dated 24.7.2009 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Faizabad in Criminal Appeal No. 65/09 (Shiv Kumar alias Sadhu v. State of U.P.) whereby the appeal was dismissed, confirming the order dated 25.6.2009 passed by learned Juvenile Justice Board, Faizabad in Case Crime No. 559/2008 under Sections 302, 201, 120-B/376, I.P.C. and under Section 3 (2) (v) SC/ST Act, Police Station Bewana, District Ambedkar Nagar in which the prayer for bail made by the revisionist has been rejected.

3. According to prosecution story, the deceased Sunita was having affair with one Amit Kumar Raidas with whom she fled away. In this regard, a report was lodged in Case Crime No. 870/2008 under Section 363/366, I.P.C. Police Station Kotwali Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar. Subsequen