PANKAJ MITHAL
SURESH GIRI – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE, U. P. ALLAHABAD – Respondent
Honble Pankaj Mithal, J.—The facts giving rise to this writ petition lies in a narrow campus.
2. A resolution was passed by the Land Management Committee village Kaseru, Tehsil Gabhana, District Aligarh on 27.2.1993 proposing to allot and lease out the land in dispute as Bhumidhari with non-transferable rights in favour of the petitioners. The said resolution was approved by the competent authority vide order dated 18.4.1993 and the names of petitioners were recorded in revenue records. A complaint was made after about 15 years on 11.2.2008 that the aforesaid allotment is irregular and as such is liable to be cancelled. On the said complaint, Case No. 57 under Section 198(4) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) was registered. Petitioners submitted an application/ objection dated 18.8.2008 alleging that complaint is patently barred by time and cannot be entertained. However, ignoring the application/objection of the petitioners dated 18.8.2008 notice dated 16.7.2009 was issued to them to show cause why the allotment made in their favour be not cancelled. Petitioners preferred a revision against the order of issuance of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.