SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 758

PANKAJ MITHAL
SURESH GIRI – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE, U. P. ALLAHABAD – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
S.N. Pandey, A.K.Pandey for the Petitioner; C.S.C., D.D. Chauhan for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Honble Pankaj Mithal, J.—The facts giving rise to this writ petition lies in a narrow campus.

2. A resolution was passed by the Land Management Committee village Kaseru, Tehsil Gabhana, District Aligarh on 27.2.1993 proposing to allot and lease out the land in dispute as Bhumidhari with non-transferable rights in favour of the petitioners. The said resolution was approved by the competent authority vide order dated 18.4.1993 and the names of petitioners were recorded in revenue records. A complaint was made after about 15 years on 11.2.2008 that the aforesaid allotment is irregular and as such is liable to be cancelled. On the said complaint, Case No. 57 under Section 198(4) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) was registered. Petitioners submitted an application/ objection dated 18.8.2008 alleging that complaint is patently barred by time and cannot be entertained. However, ignoring the application/objection of the petitioners dated 18.8.2008 notice dated 16.7.2009 was issued to them to show cause why the allotment made in their favour be not cancelled. Petitioners preferred a revision against the order of issuance of




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top