SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 3716

A.P.SAHI
VANDANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
R.K. Srivastava for the Petitioner; C.S.C. and G.S. Maurya for the Respondents.

Judgment

Honble A.P. Sahi, J.—Heard Sri R.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ghanshyam Maurya, learned counsel for the respondent, Basic Shiksha Parishad.

2. The prayer made in this writ petition is for quashing of the order dated 26th October, 2009, Annexure No. 15 to the writ petition whereby the request of transfer of the petitioner has been refused by the Secretary, Basic Shiksha Parishad. A further relief has been claimed for declaring Rule 8 of U.P. Basic Education Teachers Posting Rules, 2008 as ultra vires the provisions of Article 15 (3) of the Constitution of India.

3. As a consequential relief it has also been prayed that the petitioner should be posted in the District of Maharajganj keeping in view the fact that petitioner is now married and living with her husband.

4. The facts in detail are that the petitioner was according to her merit list appointed as a teacher under the U.P. Basic Education Services Rules, 1981 in the District of Jalaun. The petitioner at the time of her employment was unmarried and she accordingly joined the institution. The petitioner was married on 14.11.2008 to one Sri Vinay Shanker who is stated to be a businessman and r
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top