A.P.SAHI
VANDANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Honble A.P. Sahi, J.—Heard Sri R.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ghanshyam Maurya, learned counsel for the respondent, Basic Shiksha Parishad.
2. The prayer made in this writ petition is for quashing of the order dated 26th October, 2009, Annexure No. 15 to the writ petition whereby the request of transfer of the petitioner has been refused by the Secretary, Basic Shiksha Parishad. A further relief has been claimed for declaring Rule 8 of U.P. Basic Education Teachers Posting Rules, 2008 as ultra vires the provisions of Article 15 (3) of the Constitution of India.
3. As a consequential relief it has also been prayed that the petitioner should be posted in the District of Maharajganj keeping in view the fact that petitioner is now married and living with her husband.
4. The facts in detail are that the petitioner was according to her merit list appointed as a teacher under the U.P. Basic Education Services Rules, 1981 in the District of Jalaun. The petitioner at the time of her employment was unmarried and she accordingly joined the institution. The petitioner was married on 14.11.2008 to one Sri Vinay Shanker who is stated to be a businessman and r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.