Hon’ble Virendra Singh, J.—Revisionist Vijendra Singh preferred this revision against the order dated 27.5.2002 passed by the Additional District Judge IInd (Fast Track Court) Aligarh in Criminal Revision No. 299 of 2001, Smt. Sushila Devi v. Vijendra Singh and others, in which the learned lower Court has set aside the dismissal order dated 17.3.2001 passed by IInd Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Aligarh, passed on an application under Section 125, Cr.P.C moved by the respondent seeking maintenance and awarded a sum of Rs. 800/- per month as maintenance amount to the respondent.

2. The learned counsel for the revisionist contended that the respondent No. 2 had filed an application under Section 125, Cr.P.C against the revisionist on 16.1.1997 before the Judicial Magistrate IIIrd, Aligarh, in which the revisionist had filed an objection on 7.4.1999 thereby denying the allegation of the application and further stated that the respondent No. 2 was not ready to reside in the village of the revisionist and she had pressurised the revisionist to reside in her Maika or in the city at Aligarh, for which the revisionist was not inclined. The respondent had ever used to go